“If we dilute the New Testament model and spiritual essence of the house of prayer Jesus had in mind, we have missed the goal and sadly deceived ourselves into a substandard experience of His presence and power.” |
|
"A House of Prayer – or Not?"
Few would argue Jesus’ declared intention that “His house” (today the assembled church and our physical bodies as His living temples) should be a house of prayer (Mark 11:17; 1 Corinthians 3:16, 6:19). However, the romance of this idea often eclipses the reality of it in many churches.
I know pastors who publicly declare that their congregation is a “house of prayer”, which amounts to little more than receiving and distributing prayer requests. Others consider their occasional prayer events as tantamount to being a house of prayer. If we dilute the New Testament model and spiritual essence of the house of prayer Jesus had in mind, we have missed the goal and sadly deceived ourselves into a substandard experience of His presence and power.
The Original Intent
The Old Testament Temple was built as a dwelling place of God’s holy presence and a center of sacred worship, prayer, and sacrifice. In reviewing Solomon’s original dedicatory prayer for the Temple (2 Chronicles 6:12-42), I’ve been impressed with the frequent mentions of prayer. After Solomon’s prayer, the glory of the Lord filled the Temple. The people fell to their faces in awe-inspired worship. The Lord reminded them that this temple would exist as the focal point at which His people would humble themselves and pray, and seek His face – turning from their wicked ways for healing and restoration (2 Chronicles 7:14).
But what does this spiritual reality look like for your church and mine today? What does Jesus desire of us each week if we are to be an authentic house of prayer indeed, not just in word? I think the model of His own disciples in their priorities and approach created a standard every leader and believer should consider. Here are six salient observations from the model of the church from the Book of Acts.
Six Biblical Indicators of a True House of Prayer
1. Prayer was the priority over all self-centered activities – Jesus' anger over the Temple money changers was rooted in the self-serving system created by the religious leaders in order to use the funds from the sales of sacrificial animals for their own gain. He called it a “den of thieves.” A real house of prayer is a place of humility, sacrifice, and spiritual pursuit, not religious enterprise that exists for the reputational, financial, or egotistical advancement of the leaders.
2. Prayer was the birthplace of all vision and ministry –Based on Christ’s instruction, the church was birthed from the womb of a 10-day corporate prayer experience in the Upper Room (Acts 1:12 – 2:1). This became the pattern of the early church. In Acts 13:1-3 we see extraordinary prayer as the launching pad of mission expansion. Today, much of our ministry aspirations and plans are the fruit of planning, discussion, borrowed ideas from books, and the need for a new “BHAG”-- rather than the fruit of hearing from the Spirit in the context of extraordinary prayer.
3. Prayer was a consistent corporate experience at the same level of priority as all other activities – The core spiritual culture of the early church as a house of prayer was best described in Acts 2:42, where the entire congregation was continually committed to the apostles' teaching, fellowship, the breaking of bread, and the prayers. Today, very few churches prioritize a consistent church-wide experience of passionate prayer. Our gyms, fellowship halls, ball fields, and classrooms buzz with constant activities while our prayer meetings are almost non-existent.
4. Prayer was the primary resolve and resource in the face of any challenge – The example of the early church leaders and congregation in Acts 4:23-31 demonstrates their understanding of the meaning of a house of prayer. In the face of threats and persecution they gathered the entire congregation to worship and pray, asking for a greater infilling of the Holy Spirit for a bold advancement of the Gospel. Today, we too easily seek to solve problems via human reason and ecclesiastical muscle.
5. Prayer was modeled first in the leadership culture – I often point to Acts 6:1-7 as a powerful model for a biblical leadership culture. Refusing to personally administer the feeding program for the widows, the early leaders selected other competent leaders for this task so they could maintain the priorities of “prayer and the ministry of the word.” Supernatural blessing and expansion followed (see v. 7). A real house of prayer is guided by leaders who spend extraordinary amounts of time together in prayer because they have a conviction that this is the source of power, unity, direction, and blessing.
6. Prayer was the means of God-glorifying power and provision – Whether it was the church praying for boldness, the saints gathering to intercede for Peter’s release from prison, or Paul and Silas praying at midnight from the belly of the Philippian jail -- we realize that the church viewed prayer as the means of doing the work of Christ in the power of Christ. This is the DNA of a house of prayer. Again, our churches must ask honest questions about our reliance on modern ministry tools and our neglect of passionate, persevering prayer.
7. Prayer was the fuel for Spirit-inspired mission accomplishment – In a true house of prayer, prayer is not the end – but the means to the end. Prayer exists to empower us to accomplish the Great Commission of Christ in the power of Christ and for the glory of Christ. There is no other way to do His work and reach this lost world with the truth of the good news. The apostles prayed to know Him and make Him known through the enablement of the Holy Spirit. Both were core to their understanding of a house of prayer.
My friend, Pastor Jim Cymbala, has often said that the greatest answer to prayer is more prayer. The ideals we’ve just explored help us understand why. May the Lord help us to make His church a true house of prayer, not just by our declaration of the idea but through our resolute demonstration of the ideal of the New Testament.
Copyright © 2011 Daniel Henderson. All rights reserved. |
SCROLL for additional content: Commentary ~ Resources~ Replies ~
Three thoughts--
**Prayer will lead us into a relationship with God--but just how deep are we willing to go? Not willing to move forward in a relationship with God holds us back.
**To many prayer is a private thing and they seem to want to control their relationship with God. That holds us back.
**If prayer is private, then don't push it--I have seen that approach--that approach definitely hols us back.
Maybe we mentally know the need of prayer, but our heart does not respond.
Any one agree or disagree with the above? I would like to learn how to come along side of people and encourage them to consider learning more about prayer and our relationship with God. Perhaps some may have some thoughts on that.