Larry Osborne, in his very good book Sticky Church (Zondervan, 2008) writes about the difficulty of training leaders who are "overscheduled and burnt out on unnecessary meetings" as a result of having no "wiggle room in their schedules" because "It was already a stretch to set aside one night a week for their small group and another evening or lunch hour to prepare..." (pg. 134)
In addition, he talks about the disconnect between these lay leaders and church staff who "view job and church commitment as one", who might even "take the afternoon off...or sleep in late the next morning to 'recover'" and therefore, "Whereas volunteers come to extra meetings exhausted, staff members come amped up, rested, and ready to do their thing." This leads Larry to conclude that "we were asking too much." (pg. 135)
OK, there is some validity to this. It's true that lay leaders have other obligations to careers and family, etc. that make demands on their time and, while I do not endorse or share the practice, I have no doubt that there are church staff out there, even pastors, who view job and church commitment as one. However, let us not forget that Jesus said that those who desire to follow Him must deny themselves and take up their cross daily (Mark 8:34) and that those who do not do so, even placing Him above their own families, are not worthy to follow Him (Matt. 10:34-39).
How do we balance these two realities? How much is reasonable for us to expect from lay leaders to protect them from burnout while at the same time exhorting them to Christ's high standard of discipleship?
>>>KEEP SCROLLING for RELATED CONTENT & COMMENTARY, RESOURCES & REPLIES